Legal

Responsible AI

The principles and guardrails behind how we build AI interpretation — humans in the loop, minimized data, and measured quality.

v0.9Last updated August 2026

Humans stay in the loop

AI interpretation augments qualified interpreter programs; it does not replace them. Every session offers escalation to your own human interpreters — by phone dispatch to the organization’s interpreter line or through interpreter vendor integrations — and escalation events are logged. Organizations decide, per their policies and applicable law, when a qualified human interpreter is required, and the platform is built to make that handoff immediate.

AI outputs are reviewable, not autonomous

Transcripts, translations, and session summaries are presented to professionals for review — they are working drafts, not autonomous communications. Session summaries are provider-facing and intended for review by a qualified professional before any content reaches an end recipient.

Data minimization by design

  • Call audio is processed in real time for interpretation, not stockpiled.
  • Automated redaction reduces sensitive content in records kept at rest.
  • Retention is limited and enforced with scheduled deletion.
  • Organization data is isolated per tenant, with audit logging throughout.

No training on customer content

We do not use customer call audio, transcripts, or summaries to train foundation models or third-party models. Any future program using customer content for model improvement would be explicit, opt-in, and contractually documented.

No biometric identification

The platform does not create voiceprints or speaker-identification templates. We treat this as an engineering guardrail: any feature that would identify speakers biometrically would require a new privacy review and explicit consent design before it is built.

Transparency on calls

Call participants should know when AI is part of the conversation. The platform provides call announcements and disclosure tooling so organizations can meet notice requirements in their jurisdictions.

Continuous evaluation

We monitor interpretation quality across languages — including lower-resource languages where accuracy gaps are a known industry risk — and improve models and guardrails based on measured performance. Our governance approach is aligned with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework’s functions: govern, map, measure, and manage.

Questions

For security reviews, compliance documentation, or questions about our AI practices, contact ai@veyatia.com.

Questions or feedback? Email ai@veyatia.com.